<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 44 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25274</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the net dividend (after tax deduction at source) should be included in the net wealth for the assessment year 1975-76, not the gross dividend. Consequently, the court declined to answer the first question and directed the parties to bear their respective costs. The judgment was to be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench for further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:05:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 44 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25274</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the net dividend (after tax deduction at source) should be included in the net wealth for the assessment year 1975-76, not the gross dividend. Consequently, the court declined to answer the first question and directed the parties to bear their respective costs. The judgment was to be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench for further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>