<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1004 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406888</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of Rs. 23,725 under Rule 6(3)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant, an Authorized Service Station, was not liable to pay service tax on free services and warranty labor provided without consideration, as these were not generating income and had been accounted for differently. Previous orders and lack of appeal by the Department supported the appellant&#039;s position, leading to the appeal being allowed and the demand deemed unsustainable in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1004 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406888</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of Rs. 23,725 under Rule 6(3)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant, an Authorized Service Station, was not liable to pay service tax on free services and warranty labor provided without consideration, as these were not generating income and had been accounted for differently. Previous orders and lack of appeal by the Department supported the appellant&#039;s position, leading to the appeal being allowed and the demand deemed unsustainable in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>