<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 996 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406880</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by modifying the original order regarding the penalty. The penalty was recalculated to Rs. 6,41,795 under Section 129(1)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017, and the penalty already deposited by the respondent was appropriated accordingly. The appeal was disposed of in this manner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 996 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406880</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by modifying the original order regarding the penalty. The penalty was recalculated to Rs. 6,41,795 under Section 129(1)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017, and the penalty already deposited by the respondent was appropriated accordingly. The appeal was disposed of in this manner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>