<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1684 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294655</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing a re-calculation of duty payable on the damaged finished goods based on the gross amount including the insurance claim and transaction value. The penalty imposed was set aside, and the invocation of the extended period of limitation was upheld due to misinterpretation by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:16:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1684 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294655</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing a re-calculation of duty payable on the damaged finished goods based on the gross amount including the insurance claim and transaction value. The penalty imposed was set aside, and the invocation of the extended period of limitation was upheld due to misinterpretation by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>