https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406858 The court addressed the petitioner's challenge regarding the competency of the officer passing the adjudication order, noting that as the demand was dropped, the issue was not crucial. The petitioner was granted the liberty to contest if the order was reconsidered. Additionally, the court acknowledged and directed the correction of a typographical error in the order regarding Mr. Hriday Singh's designation as an officer of the Income Tax Department instead of his correct rank as Assistant Commissioner, CGST. en-us Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406858 The court addressed the petitioner's challenge regarding the competency of the officer passing the adjudication order, noting that as the demand was dropped, the issue was not crucial. The petitioner was granted the liberty to contest if the order was reconsidered. Additionally, the court acknowledged and directed the correction of a typographical error in the order regarding Mr. Hriday Singh's designation as an officer of the Income Tax Department instead of his correct rank as Assistant Commissioner, CGST. Case-Laws GST Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406858