<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 50 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25262</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in allowing the deduction under section 80J on the entire amount claimed by the assessee, including borrowed capital, without considering the provisions of rule 19A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying relief to the assessee on borrowed capital under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Each party was instructed to bear their own court costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:43:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 50 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25262</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in allowing the deduction under section 80J on the entire amount claimed by the assessee, including borrowed capital, without considering the provisions of rule 19A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying relief to the assessee on borrowed capital under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Each party was instructed to bear their own court costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>