<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 925 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406809</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the bail application, citing the petitioner&#039;s ability to address procedural and material issues during the trial. It found that the prosecution adhered to prescribed procedures and guidelines, and due to the stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, bail was denied given the critical stage of the trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:04:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 925 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406809</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the bail application, citing the petitioner&#039;s ability to address procedural and material issues during the trial. It found that the prosecution adhered to prescribed procedures and guidelines, and due to the stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, bail was denied given the critical stage of the trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>