<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 910 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406794</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition for confirmed transactions of commission but upheld the disallowance for unconfirmed transactions due to lack of evidence. Regarding the alleged undervaluation of closing stock, the ITAT found conflicting submissions and remanded the issue for re-examination to ensure consistency with the assessee&#039;s past practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 910 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406794</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition for confirmed transactions of commission but upheld the disallowance for unconfirmed transactions due to lack of evidence. Regarding the alleged undervaluation of closing stock, the ITAT found conflicting submissions and remanded the issue for re-examination to ensure consistency with the assessee&#039;s past practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>