<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 908 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406792</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the Pr.CIT(Central) lacked jurisdiction to withdraw approvals under Section 10(23C)(vi) and found the retrospective withdrawal legally flawed. Consequently, the orders withdrawing the approvals were reversed, and the approvals were reinstated. The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the assessees, emphasizing substantial justice over procedural technicalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 908 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406792</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the Pr.CIT(Central) lacked jurisdiction to withdraw approvals under Section 10(23C)(vi) and found the retrospective withdrawal legally flawed. Consequently, the orders withdrawing the approvals were reversed, and the approvals were reinstated. The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the assessees, emphasizing substantial justice over procedural technicalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>