<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 902 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406786</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal held that unrealized hedging loss on forward contracts was allowable under section 37(1) following Supreme Court precedent. The expenditure on ESOPs was also held deductible under section 37(1) based on a decision by the Karnataka High Court. The Tribunal remanded issues concerning TDS, education cess, and DDT rates for further examination by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:03:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 902 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406786</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal held that unrealized hedging loss on forward contracts was allowable under section 37(1) following Supreme Court precedent. The expenditure on ESOPs was also held deductible under section 37(1) based on a decision by the Karnataka High Court. The Tribunal remanded issues concerning TDS, education cess, and DDT rates for further examination by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>