<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 889 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406773</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 147 could not be sustained without prior valid service of notice under section 148, because service is a jurisdictional for assumption of reassessment powers. The revenue failed to prove due service: the address in the assessment record was incorrect, affixture at the last known address was not supported by reliable material, and electronic service was rejected because no valid e-mail address sourced in the manner required by section 282 read with rule 127 was shown. As the correct address was available from the return, PAN database and bank records but was not used, the reassessment was held invalid and the assessment was quashed; the merits of the additions were left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:03:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 889 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406773</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 147 could not be sustained without prior valid service of notice under section 148, because service is a jurisdictional for assumption of reassessment powers. The revenue failed to prove due service: the address in the assessment record was incorrect, affixture at the last known address was not supported by reliable material, and electronic service was rejected because no valid e-mail address sourced in the manner required by section 282 read with rule 127 was shown. As the correct address was available from the return, PAN database and bank records but was not used, the reassessment was held invalid and the assessment was quashed; the merits of the additions were left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>