<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1787 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294614</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the Appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax and penalty imposed under section 78. The Tribunal ruled that amounts received before the introduction of service tax on Club and Association services were not subject to tax. Interest was, however, deemed payable on delayed service tax payments for certain memberships. The Tribunal held that the penalty could not be upheld due to the unsustainable service tax demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1787 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294614</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the Appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax and penalty imposed under section 78. The Tribunal ruled that amounts received before the introduction of service tax on Club and Association services were not subject to tax. Interest was, however, deemed payable on delayed service tax payments for certain memberships. The Tribunal held that the penalty could not be upheld due to the unsustainable service tax demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>