<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1783 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted a proper inquiry and made a justified decision regarding the treatment of foreign currency fluctuation loss. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was deemed unsustainable as the AO&#039;s order was found not to be erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, canceling the impugned order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1783 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted a proper inquiry and made a justified decision regarding the treatment of foreign currency fluctuation loss. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was deemed unsustainable as the AO&#039;s order was found not to be erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, canceling the impugned order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>