<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1603 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294604</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the credit on outdoor catering services at the factory based on legal precedents from High Courts. The penalty imposed on the appellant was set aside as there was no suppression of information by the assessee. Both appeals and the Cross Objection were disposed of accordingly, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the credit and the absence of grounds for imposing a penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1603 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294604</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the credit on outdoor catering services at the factory based on legal precedents from High Courts. The penalty imposed on the appellant was set aside as there was no suppression of information by the assessee. Both appeals and the Cross Objection were disposed of accordingly, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the credit and the absence of grounds for imposing a penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>