https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294622 The Tribunal concluded that the appellant, a Custom House Agent, was not involved in the fraudulent export under the DEPB Scheme and that the actions taken by their employee without their knowledge did not warrant revocation of the CHA license. The Tribunal found the delays in the department's actions and the repeated suspension and revocation of the license to be unjustified. Citing discriminatory treatment among CHAs involved in the same fraudulent export, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief to the appellant in compliance with the High Court's remand order. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294622 The Tribunal concluded that the appellant, a Custom House Agent, was not involved in the fraudulent export under the DEPB Scheme and that the actions taken by their employee without their knowledge did not warrant revocation of the CHA license. The Tribunal found the delays in the department's actions and the repeated suspension and revocation of the license to be unjustified. Citing discriminatory treatment among CHAs involved in the same fraudulent export, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief to the appellant in compliance with the High Court's remand order. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294622