https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294619 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)'s decision, citing the binding precedence of the Supreme Court case Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise Nagpur Vs. Ispat Industries. The Tribunal ruled that freight charges should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty payment, in accordance with the interpretation of Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, ultimately dismissing the Department's appeal. en-us Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294619 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)'s decision, citing the binding precedence of the Supreme Court case Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise Nagpur Vs. Ispat Industries. The Tribunal ruled that freight charges should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty payment, in accordance with the interpretation of Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, ultimately dismissing the Department's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294619