<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1928 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294628</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the ITAT&#039;s order that denied the petitioner&#039;s request to raise an additional ground in their appeal. The Court emphasized that challenges regarding the limitation period for assessment could be raised in appeals and that the ITAT should have permitted the additional ground. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to raise the additional ground &#039;22&#039; before the ITAT for consideration in accordance with the law, leading to the final order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1928 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294628</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the ITAT&#039;s order that denied the petitioner&#039;s request to raise an additional ground in their appeal. The Court emphasized that challenges regarding the limitation period for assessment could be raised in appeals and that the ITAT should have permitted the additional ground. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to raise the additional ground &#039;22&#039; before the ITAT for consideration in accordance with the law, leading to the final order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>