<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1636 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294627</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR, affirming the legality of the police investigation and the validity of the Sessions Judge&#039;s order for a de novo trial and investigation. The Court emphasized the importance of following the correct legal procedures under Section 340 Cr.P.C. and Section 195 Cr.P.C., and held that the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was not warranted in this case, as there was no abuse of process or miscarriage of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1636 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294627</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR, affirming the legality of the police investigation and the validity of the Sessions Judge&#039;s order for a de novo trial and investigation. The Court emphasized the importance of following the correct legal procedures under Section 340 Cr.P.C. and Section 195 Cr.P.C., and held that the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was not warranted in this case, as there was no abuse of process or miscarriage of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>