<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1527 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294626</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed both writ petitions challenging the U.P. Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) (Amendment) Act, 2009 and the privatization of UPSSCL units. The court found the challenged sections of the Amendment Act ultra vires but upheld other provisions. It approved the Swiss Challenge Method for the sale of sugar mills, rejecting claims of flawed valuation. The petitioner was accused of misleading the court, emphasizing the consequences of fraud. Judicial propriety was highlighted, with the court refusing to entertain petitions already before the Supreme Court. The dismissal upheld the Swiss Challenge Method and privatization pending final Supreme Court adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1527 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294626</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed both writ petitions challenging the U.P. Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) (Amendment) Act, 2009 and the privatization of UPSSCL units. The court found the challenged sections of the Amendment Act ultra vires but upheld other provisions. It approved the Swiss Challenge Method for the sale of sugar mills, rejecting claims of flawed valuation. The petitioner was accused of misleading the court, emphasizing the consequences of fraud. Judicial propriety was highlighted, with the court refusing to entertain petitions already before the Supreme Court. The dismissal upheld the Swiss Challenge Method and privatization pending final Supreme Court adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>