<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1527 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294626</link>
    <description>Fresh writ challenges to the sale of sugar mills were declined because they substantially repeated issues already decided by a coordinate Bench, including the validity of the slump sale process and the Swiss Challenge Method. As the same controversy was pending before the Supreme Court, and the impugned government orders expressly made the sale subject to that outcome, the Court held that the matter should not be reopened in parallel writ proceedings. It further noted that any liberty said to have been obtained earlier could not be relied on where material facts were suppressed, since fraud vitiates judicial proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1527 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294626</link>
      <description>Fresh writ challenges to the sale of sugar mills were declined because they substantially repeated issues already decided by a coordinate Bench, including the validity of the slump sale process and the Swiss Challenge Method. As the same controversy was pending before the Supreme Court, and the impugned government orders expressly made the sale subject to that outcome, the Court held that the matter should not be reopened in parallel writ proceedings. It further noted that any liberty said to have been obtained earlier could not be relied on where material facts were suppressed, since fraud vitiates judicial proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>