<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 41 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25252</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the assessee failed to discharge the initial onus under the statutory Explanation, and the penalty was not solely based on conscious concealment. The Court directed the Tribunal to reassess the penalty amount, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:25:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 41 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25252</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the assessee failed to discharge the initial onus under the statutory Explanation, and the penalty was not solely based on conscious concealment. The Court directed the Tribunal to reassess the penalty amount, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>