<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 858 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406742</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained where it rested entirely on a quantum addition relating to exemption under section 54G, and that addition had already been deleted in quantum proceedings and confirmed in further appeal. With the foundation for the penalty gone, the Revenue could not maintain the penalty independently. The Tribunal therefore held the penalty unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:49:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 858 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406742</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained where it rested entirely on a quantum addition relating to exemption under section 54G, and that addition had already been deleted in quantum proceedings and confirmed in further appeal. With the foundation for the penalty gone, the Revenue could not maintain the penalty independently. The Tribunal therefore held the penalty unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>