<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 853 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406737</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was held admissible on service tax paid for a workmen compensation insurance policy because the policy indemnified the assessee against its statutory liability under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923. As the insured was the employer and the cover was not a benefit primarily for employees&#039; personal use or consumption, the exclusion in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply. Credit could not be denied merely because the policy related to employees, so the entitlement to credit was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 853 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406737</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was held admissible on service tax paid for a workmen compensation insurance policy because the policy indemnified the assessee against its statutory liability under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923. As the insured was the employer and the cover was not a benefit primarily for employees&#039; personal use or consumption, the exclusion in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply. Credit could not be denied merely because the policy related to employees, so the entitlement to credit was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>