<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 851 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406735</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the denial of interest on the refund claim of Rs. 25 lakhs was unjustified. It found that the amount deposited during the investigation was not towards any duty liability, and therefore, the sanction of refund under Section 129E of the Customs Act was valid. The Tribunal emphasized the obligation to refund any deposit with interest and granted consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 851 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406735</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the denial of interest on the refund claim of Rs. 25 lakhs was unjustified. It found that the amount deposited during the investigation was not towards any duty liability, and therefore, the sanction of refund under Section 129E of the Customs Act was valid. The Tribunal emphasized the obligation to refund any deposit with interest and granted consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>