https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25245 A Full Bench judgment of a High Court remains binding on single judges and Division Benches even when its operation is suspended on appeal, because suspension stops but does not erase the ratio decidendi. On compensation for acquisition of land held below the ceiling area and personally cultivated by the owner, payment in instalments is inconsistent with the constitutional requirement of compensation at market value and is treated as violative of Article 31A(1); the compensation must be paid in a lump sum. en-us Thu, 27 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25245 A Full Bench judgment of a High Court remains binding on single judges and Division Benches even when its operation is suspended on appeal, because suspension stops but does not erase the ratio decidendi. On compensation for acquisition of land held below the ceiling area and personally cultivated by the owner, payment in instalments is inconsistent with the constitutional requirement of compensation at market value and is treated as violative of Article 31A(1); the compensation must be paid in a lump sum. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 27 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25245