https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406725 A fresh private criminal complaint by the same complainant on the same incident, filed after earlier police information and a connected investigation, was treated as a material improvement over the earlier version because it added new allegations and witnesses. The Court viewed the repeated resort to criminal process, coupled with delay and suppression of material facts, as vexatious and abusive of process, exposing the accused to repetitive proceedings inconsistent with fair procedure and personal liberty. Finding the complaint to be a counter-blast and the summoning order inadequate to prevent misuse of process, the proceedings were quashed along with all connected criminal proceedings arising from the same incident. en-us Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 May 2023 11:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406725 A fresh private criminal complaint by the same complainant on the same incident, filed after earlier police information and a connected investigation, was treated as a material improvement over the earlier version because it added new allegations and witnesses. The Court viewed the repeated resort to criminal process, coupled with delay and suppression of material facts, as vexatious and abusive of process, exposing the accused to repetitive proceedings inconsistent with fair procedure and personal liberty. Finding the complaint to be a counter-blast and the summoning order inadequate to prevent misuse of process, the proceedings were quashed along with all connected criminal proceedings arising from the same incident. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406725