https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294591 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the jurisdiction of authorities under the A.P. Shops and Establishments Act, 1988. It held that the first appellate authority had quasi-judicial jurisdiction over the petitioner company, a "commercial establishment." The court emphasized that the classification of the deceased employee as a "manager" or "employee" involved disputed questions of fact requiring detailed evidence examination, not suitable for a writ petition. Allegations of bias and procedural irregularities were deemed beyond the writ's scope. The court found the writ petition not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy, instructing the petitioner to approach the second appellate authority. en-us Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:47:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294591 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the jurisdiction of authorities under the A.P. Shops and Establishments Act, 1988. It held that the first appellate authority had quasi-judicial jurisdiction over the petitioner company, a "commercial establishment." The court emphasized that the classification of the deceased employee as a "manager" or "employee" involved disputed questions of fact requiring detailed evidence examination, not suitable for a writ petition. Allegations of bias and procedural irregularities were deemed beyond the writ's scope. The court found the writ petition not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy, instructing the petitioner to approach the second appellate authority. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294591