https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294591 The A.P. Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 provides a complete appellate structure for termination disputes under Sections 47 and 48, including a further statutory appeal. Writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass that remedy where the challenge turns mainly on disputed facts and the petitioner alleges neither an ultra vires order nor an inherent lack of jurisdiction or pleaded breach of natural justice. Because the petitioner had already invoked the statutory appellate process and could still pursue the second appeal under Section 48(3), the writ petition was held not maintainable and dismissed. en-us Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:47:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294591 The A.P. Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 provides a complete appellate structure for termination disputes under Sections 47 and 48, including a further statutory appeal. Writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass that remedy where the challenge turns mainly on disputed facts and the petitioner alleges neither an ultra vires order nor an inherent lack of jurisdiction or pleaded breach of natural justice. Because the petitioner had already invoked the statutory appellate process and could still pursue the second appeal under Section 48(3), the writ petition was held not maintainable and dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294591