https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294594 Trap evidence sustained the conviction of the second accused because the tainted currency was recovered from him, the phenolphthalein test was positive, and his explanation that he acted only for the first accused did not negate his participation in the bribery transaction. The conviction of the first accused was also upheld because the evidence showed a common demand, corroboration from trap circumstances and conduct, and constructive receipt through the intermediary second accused, even though the money was taken in the first accused's absence. The Court accepted the complainant's evidence as materially corroborated in the corruption prosecution and left both convictions and sentences undisturbed. en-us Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:47:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294594 Trap evidence sustained the conviction of the second accused because the tainted currency was recovered from him, the phenolphthalein test was positive, and his explanation that he acted only for the first accused did not negate his participation in the bribery transaction. The conviction of the first accused was also upheld because the evidence showed a common demand, corroboration from trap circumstances and conduct, and constructive receipt through the intermediary second accused, even though the money was taken in the first accused's absence. The Court accepted the complainant's evidence as materially corroborated in the corruption prosecution and left both convictions and sentences undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294594