https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294594 The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of both Accused 1 and Accused 2 under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Indian Penal Code. Accused 2 was found to have accepted a bribe and was not merely acting on behalf of Accused 1. The Court affirmed the conspiracy between the accused based on evidence, including the complainant's testimony. The legitimacy of the second demand notice issued by Accused 1 was questioned, and Accused 1 was held equally responsible for the bribe demand despite not physically receiving the money. Both accused had their appeals dismissed and were ordered into custody to serve their sentences. en-us Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:47:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294594 The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of both Accused 1 and Accused 2 under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Indian Penal Code. Accused 2 was found to have accepted a bribe and was not merely acting on behalf of Accused 1. The Court affirmed the conspiracy between the accused based on evidence, including the complainant's testimony. The legitimacy of the second demand notice issued by Accused 1 was questioned, and Accused 1 was held equally responsible for the bribe demand despite not physically receiving the money. Both accused had their appeals dismissed and were ordered into custody to serve their sentences. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294594