<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 840 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted an extension of stay for four months without requiring the appellant to deposit 20% of the tax demand for assessment years 2009-10 to 2012-13. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant&#039;s reasons for the delays and directed the scheduling of hearings for the pending appeals alongside the lead case. Ultimately, all Stay Applications for the extension of stay were allowed, providing relief to the appellant from impending recovery proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:46:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 840 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted an extension of stay for four months without requiring the appellant to deposit 20% of the tax demand for assessment years 2009-10 to 2012-13. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant&#039;s reasons for the delays and directed the scheduling of hearings for the pending appeals alongside the lead case. Ultimately, all Stay Applications for the extension of stay were allowed, providing relief to the appellant from impending recovery proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>