<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (5) TMI 75 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294576</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the offence under Section 471 I.P.C. falls within the prohibition of Section 195(1)(c) Cr.P.C., while the offence under Section 467 I.P.C. can proceed without a court complaint unless the document was forged by a party to the proceeding in their capacity as such. The Court emphasized preventing frivolous prosecutions and ensuring judicial proceedings are not disrupted. The appeal was partially allowed, directing the lower court to promptly resolve the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:08:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (5) TMI 75 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294576</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the offence under Section 471 I.P.C. falls within the prohibition of Section 195(1)(c) Cr.P.C., while the offence under Section 467 I.P.C. can proceed without a court complaint unless the document was forged by a party to the proceeding in their capacity as such. The Court emphasized preventing frivolous prosecutions and ensuring judicial proceedings are not disrupted. The appeal was partially allowed, directing the lower court to promptly resolve the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>