<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 497 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294574</link>
    <description>The Gwalior Bench&#039;s territorial jurisdiction under the Presidential Order made under Section 51(2) of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 was construed consistently with Article 226(2) of the Constitution, so that a petition could be entertained where the whole or part of the cause of action arose within the specified revenue districts. On that test, the impugned order was held to have operated at Gwalior, where the petitioner was posted, and therefore a part of the cause of action arose within the Bench&#039;s limits. The earlier view in Kanti Prasad was held to have overlooked this aspect and was overruled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:54:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 497 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294574</link>
      <description>The Gwalior Bench&#039;s territorial jurisdiction under the Presidential Order made under Section 51(2) of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 was construed consistently with Article 226(2) of the Constitution, so that a petition could be entertained where the whole or part of the cause of action arose within the specified revenue districts. On that test, the impugned order was held to have operated at Gwalior, where the petitioner was posted, and therefore a part of the cause of action arose within the Bench&#039;s limits. The earlier view in Kanti Prasad was held to have overlooked this aspect and was overruled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>