<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 927 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294568</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to a bona fide belief. The Tribunal held that the assessing officer&#039;s computation of deduction under Sections 80HHC and 80-IB was not erroneous. The assessing officer&#039;s view was considered reasonable, leading to the restoration of the assessing officer&#039;s order and rejection of the CIT&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:43:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 927 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294568</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to a bona fide belief. The Tribunal held that the assessing officer&#039;s computation of deduction under Sections 80HHC and 80-IB was not erroneous. The assessing officer&#039;s view was considered reasonable, leading to the restoration of the assessing officer&#039;s order and rejection of the CIT&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>