<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 836 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406720</link>
    <description>The petitioner challenged levy and collection of tax and penalty arising from an alleged clerical error in the e-way bill, and the Delhi HC held that the grievance required consideration at this stage. Notice was issued, with directions for filing of the counter-affidavit and rejoinder, and the matter was listed for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 836 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406720</link>
      <description>The petitioner challenged levy and collection of tax and penalty arising from an alleged clerical error in the e-way bill, and the Delhi HC held that the grievance required consideration at this stage. Notice was issued, with directions for filing of the counter-affidavit and rejoinder, and the matter was listed for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>