<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 830 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406714</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Writ Petition, setting aside the Assessment Order under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 for the period April 2016 to March 2017. The matter was remitted back to the 2nd respondent for fresh consideration, with directions to provide a personal hearing to the petitioner, consider the response, and pass a reasoned order. The 2nd respondent was also ordered to pay costs of &amp;amp;8377;10,000 to the petitioner within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:19:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 830 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406714</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Writ Petition, setting aside the Assessment Order under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 for the period April 2016 to March 2017. The matter was remitted back to the 2nd respondent for fresh consideration, with directions to provide a personal hearing to the petitioner, consider the response, and pass a reasoned order. The 2nd respondent was also ordered to pay costs of &amp;amp;8377;10,000 to the petitioner within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>