<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 802 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406686</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act was not applicable in the assessment year 2013-14 as the shares were actually allotted in the following year. The appeal was partially allowed, directing the removal of additions made by the Assessing Officer under Section 56(2)(viib) for the year 2013-14. The Tribunal also left open the discussion on the valuation date and balance sheet adoption for academic considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:16:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 802 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406686</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act was not applicable in the assessment year 2013-14 as the shares were actually allotted in the following year. The appeal was partially allowed, directing the removal of additions made by the Assessing Officer under Section 56(2)(viib) for the year 2013-14. The Tribunal also left open the discussion on the valuation date and balance sheet adoption for academic considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>