<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 36 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order to value agricultural land at Rs. 12,000 per bigha, considering the location and differences in valuation basis. Challenges against the Tribunal&#039;s findings for ignoring relevant facts and misstatement of facts were dismissed. The court clarified that varying valuations for different proceedings were justified. Allegations of ignoring legal principles were also rejected, leading to the dismissal of all challenges against the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 36 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order to value agricultural land at Rs. 12,000 per bigha, considering the location and differences in valuation basis. Challenges against the Tribunal&#039;s findings for ignoring relevant facts and misstatement of facts were dismissed. The court clarified that varying valuations for different proceedings were justified. Allegations of ignoring legal principles were also rejected, leading to the dismissal of all challenges against the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>