<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1600 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294556</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that &quot;dant mukta&quot; used in the manufacture of &quot;lal dant manjan&quot; is correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 33061010, eligible for a concessional duty rate and benefit under Notification No. 02/2011-CE. The extended period of limitation was not applicable, and penalties and interest were not imposed due to the absence of intent to evade duty. The appeal was allowed, and the previous order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:15:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1600 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294556</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that &quot;dant mukta&quot; used in the manufacture of &quot;lal dant manjan&quot; is correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 33061010, eligible for a concessional duty rate and benefit under Notification No. 02/2011-CE. The extended period of limitation was not applicable, and penalties and interest were not imposed due to the absence of intent to evade duty. The appeal was allowed, and the previous order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>