<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1597 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294553</link>
    <description>The appellant was granted Cenvat credit on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and Management Consultancy Services as they were used for both exempted and dutiable goods. The extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable as the issue was interpretational and all transactions were duly recorded. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting the appellant consequential benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:15:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1597 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294553</link>
      <description>The appellant was granted Cenvat credit on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and Management Consultancy Services as they were used for both exempted and dutiable goods. The extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable as the issue was interpretational and all transactions were duly recorded. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting the appellant consequential benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>