https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294546 An application for condonation of delay was refused because the appeal was filed with an unexplained inordinate delay of 394 days, so the appeal was not entertained on that procedural ground. The Court also examined the merits independently and found no basis to interfere with the impugned decision, so the civil appeal would have failed even if the delay objection had been waived. The document therefore records dismissal both for want of prosecution and on merits. en-us Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Apr 2021 13:32:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294546 An application for condonation of delay was refused because the appeal was filed with an unexplained inordinate delay of 394 days, so the appeal was not entertained on that procedural ground. The Court also examined the merits independently and found no basis to interfere with the impugned decision, so the civil appeal would have failed even if the delay objection had been waived. The document therefore records dismissal both for want of prosecution and on merits. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294546