<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 59 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25230</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the Revenue failed to prove concealment of income regarding the undervaluation of closing stock. Therefore, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was not justified. The court did not address the second issue raised in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:41:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 59 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25230</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the Revenue failed to prove concealment of income regarding the undervaluation of closing stock. Therefore, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was not justified. The court did not address the second issue raised in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>