https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406668 The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court found that the complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt at the time of the cheque's issuance, casting doubt on the accused's liability. The lack of evidence linking the accused to the debt or contractual obligations regarding the event led to the dismissal of the appeal. The judgment upheld the trial court's decision to acquit the accused based on insufficient proof of debt and liability. en-us Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:54:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406668 The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court found that the complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt at the time of the cheque's issuance, casting doubt on the accused's liability. The lack of evidence linking the accused to the debt or contractual obligations regarding the event led to the dismissal of the appeal. The judgment upheld the trial court's decision to acquit the accused based on insufficient proof of debt and liability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406668