<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 778 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2008-2009 and 2010-2011, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the disallowances of professional fees and premium on forward cover. The Tribunal found that the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer were not sustainable in law, as the expenses were deemed legitimate and necessary for the ordinary course of business, meeting the criteria set forth in the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 778 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2008-2009 and 2010-2011, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the disallowances of professional fees and premium on forward cover. The Tribunal found that the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer were not sustainable in law, as the expenses were deemed legitimate and necessary for the ordinary course of business, meeting the criteria set forth in the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>