<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 775 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed that the Lease Agreement qualified as a Financial Lease, the Second Respondent was deemed a Financial Creditor, and the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to admit the application under Section 7 of the I&amp;amp;B Code was upheld. The Tribunal determined that the debt in question constituted a Financial Debt, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:54:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 775 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed that the Lease Agreement qualified as a Financial Lease, the Second Respondent was deemed a Financial Creditor, and the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to admit the application under Section 7 of the I&amp;amp;B Code was upheld. The Tribunal determined that the debt in question constituted a Financial Debt, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>