<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 762 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406646</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions on both counts: deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) and unexplained cash credit under Section 68. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately demonstrated that the transactions were genuine and that the provisions cited by the AO were not applicable for the assessment year in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:53:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 762 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406646</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions on both counts: deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) and unexplained cash credit under Section 68. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately demonstrated that the transactions were genuine and that the provisions cited by the AO were not applicable for the assessment year in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>