https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294542 The appellate court overturned the trial court's decision and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 3,75,000, with Rs. 3,70,000 as compensation to the complainant and Rs. 5,000 to be remitted to the government. The court found that the complainant had sufficiently proven the issuance of the cheque and the existence of a legally enforceable debt, shifting the burden of proof to the accused under Section 139 of the N.I. Act. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:52:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294542 The appellate court overturned the trial court's decision and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 3,75,000, with Rs. 3,70,000 as compensation to the complainant and Rs. 5,000 to be remitted to the government. The court found that the complainant had sufficiently proven the issuance of the cheque and the existence of a legally enforceable debt, shifting the burden of proof to the accused under Section 139 of the N.I. Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294542