https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294544 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC may justify quashing where defence material at the pre-trial stage is strong enough to displace bare accusations and continuing the prosecution would amount to abuse of process. On the facts noted, the disputed shares were shown to have been acquired from the funds of the accused and kept in his custody, while the complainant produced no dependable material to support his own-funds claim. Given the surrounding civil and criminal disputes and the vindictive character of the complaint, the prosecution was held liable to be quashed and the discharge application allowed. en-us Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Nov 2022 15:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294544 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC may justify quashing where defence material at the pre-trial stage is strong enough to displace bare accusations and continuing the prosecution would amount to abuse of process. On the facts noted, the disputed shares were shown to have been acquired from the funds of the accused and kept in his custody, while the complainant produced no dependable material to support his own-funds claim. Given the surrounding civil and criminal disputes and the vindictive character of the complaint, the prosecution was held liable to be quashed and the discharge application allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294544