<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1594 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294528</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the CB License and the forfeiture of the security deposit. The tribunal emphasized the need for justifiable reasons for delays in the inquiry process and found that the evidence did not support the allegations of subletting the license. The order was pronounced in the open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 20:45:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1594 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294528</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the CB License and the forfeiture of the security deposit. The tribunal emphasized the need for justifiable reasons for delays in the inquiry process and found that the evidence did not support the allegations of subletting the license. The order was pronounced in the open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>