<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1961 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294526</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently proven the legitimacy of the loan transaction and the source of the loan amount. Consequently, the addition of the undisclosed loan as unexplained income under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 20:45:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1961 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294526</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently proven the legitimacy of the loan transaction and the source of the loan amount. Consequently, the addition of the undisclosed loan as unexplained income under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>