<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1345 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of scheme expenses totaling Rs. 8,32,75,381, incurred for mutual fund promotion under a contractual obligation, as allowable u/s 37(1) of the Act. Additionally, the Tribunal remanded the issue of disallowance of Rs. 4,06,140 on account of leave encashment back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, partly allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:22:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1345 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of scheme expenses totaling Rs. 8,32,75,381, incurred for mutual fund promotion under a contractual obligation, as allowable u/s 37(1) of the Act. Additionally, the Tribunal remanded the issue of disallowance of Rs. 4,06,140 on account of leave encashment back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, partly allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>