https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294516 A complaint disclosing specific allegations on its face can justify cognizance and issuance of process where those allegations, if proved, may sustain criminal liability. In revision, defence material first produced by the accused cannot ordinarily be relied on to quash the complaint unless it was part of the Magistrate's record and is of unimpeachable character; questions of genuineness and ratification are not to be decided summarily at that stage. An earlier complaint already quashed does not create a parallel proceeding or render cognizance defective, and no Section 202 CrPC non-compliance was found to warrant interference. The High Court's restoration of the cognizance order was upheld. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Apr 2021 12:40:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294516 A complaint disclosing specific allegations on its face can justify cognizance and issuance of process where those allegations, if proved, may sustain criminal liability. In revision, defence material first produced by the accused cannot ordinarily be relied on to quash the complaint unless it was part of the Magistrate's record and is of unimpeachable character; questions of genuineness and ratification are not to be decided summarily at that stage. An earlier complaint already quashed does not create a parallel proceeding or render cognizance defective, and no Section 202 CrPC non-compliance was found to warrant interference. The High Court's restoration of the cognizance order was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294516