<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1877 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment under Section 148, as the Assessing Officer acted on suspicion without verifying information. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted the additions of Rs. 18,00,000 and Rs. 36,000, as the assessee provided substantial evidence proving the genuineness of transactions and lack of unexplained expenditure. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:51:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1877 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment under Section 148, as the Assessing Officer acted on suspicion without verifying information. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted the additions of Rs. 18,00,000 and Rs. 36,000, as the assessee provided substantial evidence proving the genuineness of transactions and lack of unexplained expenditure. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>